Refusing to take a breathalyzer test in New Jersey is a significant legal issue with serious consequences. Under New Jersey law, specifically N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.2, drivers are considered to have given their implied consent to submit to chemical...
The “community caretaking” doctrine is a crucial, yet often misunderstood, legal principle in New Jersey’s criminal law. It allows police officers to perform warrantless searches and seizures under certain circumstances without...
Vaccines are critical in preventing diseases, but like any medical intervention, they can sometimes cause adverse effects. If you believe you’ve been harmed by a vaccine, it’s important to understand the legal process for seeking...
In the recent case of Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Attorney General New Jersey, the court addressed significant issues related to the regulation of firearm manufacturers’ marketing practices and the extent of state authority in...
In the case of Tyree Deshawn Mims vs. City of Gloucester, et al. (L-2054-23, Camden County and Statewide), the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, addressed Mims’ request for an indigency waiver for court fees. The court’s...
On June 30, 2024, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey issued a pivotal ruling in the case Englewood Hospital & Medical Center, et al. vs. The State of New Jersey, et al. (L-1434-17 and L-1397-18, Mercer County and...
On April 3, 2022, the Appellate Division of New Jersey delivered a significant opinion in the case of State of New Jersey vs. Mary Mellody, which has substantial implications for both Sussex County and the state at large. This decision highlights...
On April 3, 2022, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, issued a notable decision in the case of State of New Jersey vs. Mary Mellody. The court’s ruling has significant implications for the boundaries of police authority...
On May 6, 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling in the case of Viktoriya Usachenok v. State of New Jersey, Department of the Treasury (A-40-22) (086861). This decision addressed the constitutionality of a regulation...
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently delivered a significant opinion in the case of State v. Andrew Higginbotham (A-57-22), addressing the constitutionality of certain provisions in New Jersey’s child pornography laws. Case Background...
The New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P), previously known as the Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS), is a critical agency within the state’s Department of Children and Families. Its primary mission...
In recent years, New Jersey has been at the forefront of bail reform efforts in the United States. The state’s approach aims to address issues of fairness, public safety, and efficiency within the criminal justice system. Let’s delve...